I’ve been wanting to mention this, but it needed to percolate for a few days. As you may remember, Gary Sheffield was asked about the predominance of Latin players in MLB compared to black players. Here’s what he said:
“I called it years ago. What I called is that you’re going to see more black faces, but there ain’t no English going to be coming out. … [It’s about] being able to tell [Latin players] what to do — being able to control them,” he told the magazine.
“Where I’m from, you can’t control us. You might get a guy to do it that way for a while because he wants to benefit, but in the end, he is going to go back to being who he is. And that’s a person that you’re going to talk to with respect, you’re going to talk to like a man.
“These are the things my race demands. So, if you’re equally good as this Latin player, guess who’s going to get sent home? I know a lot of players that are home now can outplay a lot of these guys.”
“They have more to lose than we do. You can send them back across the island. You can’t send us back. We’re already here.”
And the race was on to call Sheffield a moron, usually without bothering to address the content of his remarks. Here’s Jeff Pearlman’s take on Sheffield. I defy anyone to read it and explain to me what Pearlman adds to the discussion. He must believe that his exposure of John Rocker as a racist gasbag gives him license to pen ad hominem attacks against anyone who brings up the topic of race.
I don’t believe that Sheffield is a moron — he strikes me as an intelligent man who has a chip on his shoulder. I don’t think it’s out of bounds to say he might be a little bit paranoid. But here’s the thing about paranoids — they pay meticulously close attention to the world around them, and Sheffield is in his 22nd year of organized ball. It may be his tendency to view the world through the prism of race to a myopic extent, but before we condemn him out of hand, shouldn’t we first attempt to assess the possible truth of what he said?
A few people have. Here’s Torii Hunter:
“You can go to Latin America and get that same talent as a black player in Compton and if he’s in Compton he gets drafted in the first round he’s going to get two million dollars…If he doesn’t pan out, you’re out two million dollars but if you go to the Domincan, Cuba, or whatever and you can get a guy for two thousand dollars and he doesn’t pan out you’re only down two thousand dollars.”
Here’s Carlos Guillen:
“I’m happy he said it…I’m glad somebody spoke up…In my first year, in rookie league, I hurt my elbow and I played DH. In my first at-bat, I hit a double, and I missed first base. I was out, and they screamed at me. I didn’t know what to say. If I had said anything, they would have sent me home. I was afraid to talk. That happens to every Latin player. They are afraid to talk.”
Here’s Ozzie Guillen:
“Maybe we’re hungrier…We’re trying to survive. Those guys sign for $500,000 or $1 million and they’re made. We have a couple of dollars. You can sign one African-American player for the price of 30 Latin players.”
Sheffield makes two arguments, one economic and one cultural. That he did so with his usual air of defiance caused most commenters to give him the figurative finger. But both arguments have merit, based on a simple risk/reward calculation. To management, the question is one of economics: Which player do I sign? To the players, it’s cultural: What happens to me if I fail?
I’m grateful for pot-stirrers like Gary Sheffield. Without him, not only would this topic not have been discussed, but I personally would never have thought of it. I look forward to more reactions to the content of his remarks.